View Single Post
  #47   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-03-2006, 23:26
Jack Jones Jack Jones is offline
Retired
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Waterford, MI
Posts: 964
Jack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Pinning? Apparently I just don't seem to understand

We should all agree to accept whichever way the head refs decide to call a play like that. I think we can also agree that it certainly falls into the "tough call" category.

In my opinion, it would be pinning. The robot was between a rock and a hard place, with the other bot the rock and the ramp the hard place. Going onto the ramp against your will, even if you can, is not a good place to be. A large percentage of those who do end up on their backside. And they are forced to go where the other bot can legally pin them. It's like putting a gun to someones head and claiming it wasn't your fault they jumped of that cliff.

Consider last year (rules don't extend to the next year, but common sense does) a team could have held a bot against a goal and claimed it wasn't pinning because the other bot could have gone into the goal and out the other side. I wouldn't buy that. And I don't buy that holding against the ramp isn't pinning - unless THEY say it's not.

Last edited by Jack Jones : 13-03-2006 at 23:29.