View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-03-2006, 14:44
DjAlamose's Avatar
DjAlamose DjAlamose is offline
Registered User
AKA: Teh Albie
FRC #0279 (Tech Fusion)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Toledo, OH
Posts: 343
DjAlamose is a splendid one to beholdDjAlamose is a splendid one to beholdDjAlamose is a splendid one to beholdDjAlamose is a splendid one to beholdDjAlamose is a splendid one to beholdDjAlamose is a splendid one to beholdDjAlamose is a splendid one to beholdDjAlamose is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to DjAlamose
Re: Is Engineering truly "Glamourous"???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Hibner
I've said this before, but I'll say it again here.

In my opinion, if you want engineers to be thought of as glamorous, then you need to put them in glamorous positions. In other words, we need to be on TV.

What about doing something crazy with FIRST: forming the NRL (the National Robotics League) - the first ever professional robot competition. You could have 30 teams from different cities around the US. Take the best engineers from FIRST teams and assign them to the pro team in their area, set up sponsorship deals, and get it on TV. Have super high-quality robots competing in a difficult game in a series of competitions ending with a big championship in the end. Think of it like NASCAR, but with robots and regional interests.

If a professional robotics competition were to take-off, the payoff would be huge. Engineers would really be heros to everyday Joe Schmos and their kids. Kids would really consider getting into top engineering schools with the hope of becoming a professional robot competition engineer. If they don't make it to one of the pro teams, then at least they have an engineering degree and a great career. If a minor league player becomes washed up at age 25 before making it to the Bigs, what does he have? A big fat nothing. But if the aspiring pro robot competition engineer doesn't make it to the Show, (s)he can still make it big in the right company.

Anyway, it's just a crazy thought.
Think Battlebots and Junkyard wars. Yes these shows where around, but they fizzled after a while as with just about every TV show. There needs to be something more permanent and not something solely created for TV. The reason people watched battebots was for the destruction, and the reason people watched junkyard wars was because of the ingenuity of how junk was turned into machines. While cool looking bots may be nice, they may not draw a crowd or envelope a fan base.

There needs to be something that is more permanent and FIRST is doing a great job. I see no reason why FIRST can’t be watched on TV. It all comes down to editing anyways so only the best footage would get shown. I remember seeing a documentary on a first team on PBS once (the cheesy poofs I do believe). But it came down to editing in the drama and action and removing most of the day to day stuff.
__________________
WHAT TIME IS IT????? 279!!


2006 GLR Safety Award (2nd year in a row)
2005 National Xerox Creativity Award
2005 National Curie Quarter Finalist w/ 1126 and 180
2005 Buckeye Regional Champs w/ 67 and 274
2005 Buckeye Regional GM Industrial Design Award
2005 Buckeye Regional Safety Award
2005 GLR Quarter Finalist
2005 GLR Xerox Creativity Award
2005 GLR Safety Award
2004 Nationals Curie Division Finalist
2004 GLR Champs
2004 Buckeye Delphi Driving Tomorrow Award
2004 Buckeye Quarter Finalist w/ 1001 and 869
2003 GM Industrial Design Award GLR
2001 National Champs
Reply With Quote