Thread: #1 seeded teams
View Single Post
  #31   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-03-2006, 17:18
Sgraff_SRHS06's Avatar
Sgraff_SRHS06 Sgraff_SRHS06 is offline
Kappa != 1/(4Pi-Epsilon-Naut)
AKA: Steve Graff
FRC #1111 (The Power Hawks)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Ghetto D/CP, MD
Posts: 515
Sgraff_SRHS06 is a jewel in the roughSgraff_SRHS06 is a jewel in the roughSgraff_SRHS06 is a jewel in the roughSgraff_SRHS06 is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via AIM to Sgraff_SRHS06 Send a message via Yahoo to Sgraff_SRHS06
Re: #1 seeded teams

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Delles
All I am trying to say is that as Alan as said we don't play enough matches to prove who really should be seeded number 1 or number 2, that they are just rough approxamations. Looking at FLR, some of the top seeded teams never played against each other. Also remember that the #1 seeded team may need something different than what the #2 seeded team has to offer. But yes if you want to take it as me saying the robots are placed in random order then go ahead and do so, because when thinking about ranking you don't take into account matches when you have 2 robots against 3 because someone didn't make the match (Since that is not a good judge of your robot with respect to the alliance). You don't play all the robots at a regional, and I would venture to say that you barely play half at the Championship. So the best robots could be teams that aren't seeded number 1 and number 2. But by all means if you are number 1 pick the #2 seed. Because i know that if i was the number 3 seed, i would pick a perfect partner for me, no matter thier seed.
Exactly agreed. That is why you sometimes pick oddball partners. They may work to help you or they may serve to hurt you. But it's all luck (we found out the hard way).
__________________
POWERHAWKS FORUM

2006 Chesapeake Regional Semifinalists (Thank you 614 and 339!)

UM Class of 2010!!