View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-03-2006, 13:56
Tom Bottiglieri Tom Bottiglieri is offline
Registered User
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,186
Tom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Innovation In Control Award Winners

Quote:
Originally Posted by thoughtful
We(1219) won it in Waterloo. I know we had 6 sensors ranging from hall effect, gyros, e.t.c to IR sensors. We could plot points on a tablet pc then load the program in the robot and have it carry the waypoints out. We were also making sure stuff like our shooting wheel was enough speed, balls werent jamming e.t.c in manual operation. Although we rarely used this due to the fact that our robot can easily stay in its starting spot and shoot, which gave other teams on our alliance a chance to move around. However for GTR i know they made even more improvements. I will have our programmer post a full description.
How did you store the waypoint data?

We loaded our waypoint data into the EEPROM. Our autonomous mode handler parsed the data out of the eeprom and called functions according to the data values we passed into the ROM. This made things considerably easier, because we only needed to compile our C program once, and we made changes on the fly via laptop (we will have a pocket pc for atl!)

Also, we incorporated a serial LCD screen on the robot to spew out diagnostics. This came in very handy when trying to debug the system, and while tuning our control loops.
Reply With Quote