View Single Post
  #20   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-03-2006, 23:12
razor95kds's Avatar
razor95kds razor95kds is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Menlo Park, CA
Posts: 91
razor95kds has a spectacular aura aboutrazor95kds has a spectacular aura aboutrazor95kds has a spectacular aura about
Re: Good drivetrains observed

Quote:
Originally Posted by s_forbes
753 had the best drivetrain that I think I've ever seen. They went with treads that were (I think) 2" wide and made of a very sticky material. It was the most robust design by far at the Sacramento competition and they had no trouble pushing us sideways towards the ramp and then sideways up the ramp.

Fortunately we got 1662 on our alliance, and they were the only team that I saw push 753 around. 1662 had 4 2" wide, 8" diameter IFI traction wheels, and they could push around whoever they wanted. Their robot was a little on the skinny and long side, though, so they hopped quite a bit while turning.

I felt that 753 had too much traction and paid for it in the finals when they started tripping breakers from drawing so much current from its drivetrain. Besides that I that that robot was great and I look forward to see it at nationals.

Our robot this year uses 6 wheels that only has 4 on the gound at a time, which allows smooth turning without sacrificing any traction. I felt our robot could push almost everyone at Sac and SVR, but 1662 proved us wrong. our robot has a wedge on the back and 1662 rode on it, putting them on two wheels and they still pushed us. I felt that 1662 had the most pushing power and traction but suffered from an inability to turn smoothly.