View Single Post
  #82   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-04-2006, 13:58
RogerR's Avatar
RogerR RogerR is offline
its spelled *ya'll*, not *y'all*
AKA: Roger Riquelme
FRC #3844 (Wildbots)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Somerset, KY
Posts: 913
RogerR has a reputation beyond reputeRogerR has a reputation beyond reputeRogerR has a reputation beyond reputeRogerR has a reputation beyond reputeRogerR has a reputation beyond reputeRogerR has a reputation beyond reputeRogerR has a reputation beyond reputeRogerR has a reputation beyond reputeRogerR has a reputation beyond reputeRogerR has a reputation beyond reputeRogerR has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to RogerR Send a message via MSN to RogerR
Re: The Niagara Triplets the best team(s) in 2006?

Quote:
Originally Posted by abrockhoff
I don't think that the Niagara triplets style of a build season should be supported by FIRST. Three teams building the same robot does nothing except increase the chance of that robot design winning the championship. If they are really as good as everyone says they are, then this is only a result of the shared resources of three teams creating a single robot design, by themselves I doubt these teams could achieve such results. If you want to have a large member base for diverse design ideas, then create a single, large team, don't increase your probability of winning by acting as a single team and building three identical robots.

I don't mean to start any rants, but think about it for a second. Imagine if a veteran team split up and created the same robot on each team, entering the three of them into the competition, and then won with the three of them on an alliance. There would probably quite an uproar from the rest of the community. The Niagara Triplets system is just a step in the direction of a team monopoly on championships.

Obviously what they did is not against any rules, and this post is just an opinion, but I'm curious as what other's think about how these teams built their robots.
that doesn't sound like cheating to me. that just sounds like a good strategy. if we want to eliminate 'build season styles' that increase the likelihood of a team winning, then why don't we outlaw lathes, mills, welders, etc; or dis-allow parts bought from anywhere but home depot or lowes (no not even ACE hardware )? its been said before, but i'll say it again:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Kamen
FIRST isn't supposed to be fair.
additionally, veteran teams split up all the time. teams 494, 710, and 64 have all spun off different teams, and 494 and 70 (there spin-off team) fielded identical robots. these veteran teams spin-off for the same reason that other teams collaborate: because they've found that it allows them to reach more students. and that, i feel, is definitely a 'winning' style of build season.
__________________
"But to say that the race is a metaphor for life is to miss the point. The race is everything. It obliterates whatever isn't racing. Life is a metaphor for the race." -- Donald Antrim
Reply With Quote