View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-04-2006, 03:40
eugenebrooks eugenebrooks is offline
Team Role: Engineer
AKA: Dr. Brooks
no team (WRRF)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 601
eugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Possible bug in memory initialization?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Betts
Doc,

Are you saying that explicit or implicit initializations are corrupted?

I have seen no issues with explicit initializations and have strongly advised everyone who cares to listen to avoid them.

JMHO.

Mike
Mike, I don't think that there is any need to re-visit the thread you point to here, I don't disagree with the view you posted there. My question is whether or not the assumption that the variables in the routine in question are allocated in the same section can ever be violated...