View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-04-2006, 17:58
JackN JackN is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jack Nowakowski
no team
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Lansing
Posts: 1,248
JackN has a reputation beyond reputeJackN has a reputation beyond reputeJackN has a reputation beyond reputeJackN has a reputation beyond reputeJackN has a reputation beyond reputeJackN has a reputation beyond reputeJackN has a reputation beyond reputeJackN has a reputation beyond reputeJackN has a reputation beyond reputeJackN has a reputation beyond reputeJackN has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Ideal Alliance Structure

I have been thinking a lot about this lately and it hit me.
You need two shooters for sure but you need inside/outside balance.
Let me explain. You want one of your shooters to get close and take close up high percentage acuracy shots and you want your other one to shoot from a distance. Your third team (Probably a third pick) should be able to shoot as well needs to play defense. I think of the San Antonio Spurs when i think of this system. They have Tim Duncan who can shoot very well from up close and is very acurate. They have Tony Parker who shoots from all over the court and scores a whole lot. Then they have Bruce Bowen a player who can shoot and plays excellent defense. A robotic excample would be having 111 (Close Shooter) 494 (Distance shooter) and 451 (Shooter and Defender. This is a tough aliance to beat. If somone tries to defend any of the robots it opens up a different one. If the close defender gets guarded then the other distance shooters can get open shots and vice-versa
__________________
2005-2007 Team 494 (Lead Scout and Strategist)
2008 Team 70 (Drive Coach)
2009-2011 Team 1504 (College Mentor)