View Single Post
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-05-2006, 22:50
BBnum3's Avatar
BBnum3 BBnum3 is offline
Ridiculously proud of MN First
AKA: Nat Thompson
FRC #1816 (The Green Machine)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Edina, MN
Posts: 136
BBnum3 is a splendid one to beholdBBnum3 is a splendid one to beholdBBnum3 is a splendid one to beholdBBnum3 is a splendid one to beholdBBnum3 is a splendid one to beholdBBnum3 is a splendid one to beholdBBnum3 is a splendid one to beholdBBnum3 is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to BBnum3
Re: Bumpers here to stay?

I really liked the bumpers this year and I hope they come back next year. I think that a lot of "ramming" with bumpers would cause less damage than a little "ramming" without them. My team used them as we were a defensive robot and they worked out nicely. They also help to absorb some of the shock caused by collisions.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billfred
Some of the rules about bumpers were
annoying to me. If they were to allow some angled cuts (no obvious wedges, though), and also authorize a one-noodle version of the bumper for those times when you want more clearance, I could stand to see them return.
From what I saw with my team, angled cuts weren't illegal, that is if we're talking about the same kind of angled cuts. You can see on this picture of the robot that the back 1/4 of our bumper is only one noodle. We did this so we could get on the ramp at the end. I'm glad that we didn't have to change this because the open space in the back of our bumper didn't really affect contact outside of the bumper zone. I hope that next year angled cuts are allowed, too, because it doesn't really change game play if they are disallowed.
__________________
Founding member of Team 1816.

Last edited by BBnum3 : 09-05-2006 at 22:50. Reason: ...stupid typo...
Reply With Quote