View Single Post
  #38   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-05-2006, 13:15
Daniel_LaFleur's Avatar
Daniel_LaFleur Daniel_LaFleur is online now
Mad Scientist
AKA: Me
FRC #2040 (DERT)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 1,981
Daniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to Daniel_LaFleur
Re: Bumpers here to stay?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Cormier
If your robot was at all on the ramp it was totally legal of any kind while robot is not fully on the carpet.
Incorrect.
<G22> [snip] • Rule <R35> in Section 5.3.4 establishes ROBOT bumper zones. Any contact within this zone is
generally acceptable, with the exception of high speed long distance ramming.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Cormier
It is not the NFL, you don't get time to challenge a play and have the head ref take time out of the next match to watch a video.
Please do not get me wrong, I was not complaining. All I was doing was pointing out to the previous poster that asking a referee to review a play was tried and was not allowed.

And as I said before, all was fair since the refs called the game the same for all matches (no broken robot, no foul).
Reply With Quote