View Single Post
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-06-2006, 23:12
JoeXIII'007's Avatar
JoeXIII'007 JoeXIII'007 is offline
Pragmatic Strategy, I try...
AKA: Joeseph Smith
FRC #0066
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Ypsilanti, MI (Ann Arbor's shadow)
Posts: 753
JoeXIII'007 has a reputation beyond reputeJoeXIII'007 has a reputation beyond reputeJoeXIII'007 has a reputation beyond reputeJoeXIII'007 has a reputation beyond reputeJoeXIII'007 has a reputation beyond reputeJoeXIII'007 has a reputation beyond reputeJoeXIII'007 has a reputation beyond reputeJoeXIII'007 has a reputation beyond reputeJoeXIII'007 has a reputation beyond reputeJoeXIII'007 has a reputation beyond reputeJoeXIII'007 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to JoeXIII'007
Re: If there are no winners?

OK, cheating is like weaponery, advanced weaponery that was never included with the instruction manual.

I am alright with the argument that if there were no winners and cheating was involved, then its OK because obviously cheating didn't give anyone an unfair advantage.

But then we meet Mr. On Ess Tee, who refuses to cheat, but builds one of the best characters, gameplans, strategies, whatever. He becomes a loser in this battle of no winners with cheaters. You just gotta feel sorry for the guy, ya know.

Besides, if you cheat, you're an ethical loser. No if and or buts about it. SO, would you prefer to be the loser that cheated, or the loser that fought the good fight?
__________________
Joeseph P. Smith
jpthesmithe.com
University of Michigan - Informatics (B. Sci. 2012)
General Purpose Programmer - Cooperative Institute for Limnology and Ecosystems Research (CILER) at NOAA-GLERL
Reply With Quote