View Single Post
  #32   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-07-2006, 00:50
artdutra04's Avatar
artdutra04 artdutra04 is offline
VEX Robotics Engineer
AKA: Arthur Dutra IV; NERD #18
FRC #0148 (Robowranglers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Greenville, TX
Posts: 3,078
artdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Steve Jones and his physics analysis of 9/11...

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeXIII'007
2. First, I need to correct that it was flight 91 that was taken over. Secondly, no one has done much investigation into the Pentagon attack, because all evidence was either seized or destroyed. Surveillance videos included. The only video from the actual impact is 4 frames, which show nothing and then a great big ball of fire. Witnesses describe hearing missile like noises before the explosion there (loose change documentary). Lastly, I think a government knows that pulling explosives out of any building after a failed attempt would bring a crap load of suspicion, thus they know as long as there are no fires, there won't be any explosions, and the thermite shouldn't be too much of a problem. So they leave it there just to be on the safe side secrecy.(answer to 3)
Actually the 4th hijacked plane that crashed in Pennslyvania was United Airlines Flight 93 - not flight 73 or 91.

As for many conspiracy theories, I really can't buy into them. I have a big problem with the witnesses hearing a "missile" part. Were they aeronautical engineers or pilots or people who can actually tell the difference between an aircraft engine at full speeds and a cruise missile? No, they were just ordinary civilians for the most part. To them, any high-pitched wailing sounds like whatever they want it to sound like. Some may have said it sounds like a dentist drill, while others will say a missile. Are both correct? Yes.

Is this any different than describing anything that is really loud (read: hurricane, tornado) as a freight train? I've been through a Category 4 hurricane, and it is incredibly loud and a freight train is not bad analogy. But at the same time, I can also say that it sounds like the backup generator room where I work when it is generating away at full-power. Now an ordinary unknowing citizen is never going to compare a hurricane to a generator room, because they've never been in one and they don't know what it sounds like. They will only describe things in terms they know.

And maybe, just maybe, some details of this post don't add up. Did Arthur Dutra really write this post, or did the government plant a robot at his computer while aliens abducted him in a UFO to Area 51, and showed him videos of the second sniper from the grassy knoll in Dallas, as well as videos of how the government Photoshopped images of astronaut's bootprints onto to the lunar surface. OMG, I said too much! Must.... resist.... CIA.... agents....
__________________
Art Dutra IV
Robotics Engineer, VEX Robotics, Inc., a subsidiary of Innovation First International (IFI)
Robowranglers Team 148 | GUS Robotics Team 228 (Alumni) | Rho Beta Epsilon (Alumni) | @arthurdutra

世上无难事,只怕有心人.
Reply With Quote