Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Steve W
So if I can find people that are willing to say that we should be able to print money then this civil disobedience is OK. Laws are written to prevent anarchy. Why does everyone think that it is OK as long as it doesn't effect them. For example, I see that your team has lots of money.Sitting right there in front of our poor team is 6 laptops. We ask to use one of the laptops for price of a box of Krispy Kreams.We all agree that your team has too much money so we should have the the right to the laptop. We leave the event with the laptop and feel good that we have equaled the playing field some what.
Are you OK with this?
|
If a majority of the population thinks it is ok, then it should be legal. That is democracy.
If my team and your team both agree that you can have a laptop for a box of Krispy Kremes, then go right ahead. The problem lies in the fact that only your team agrees, not mine.
I'm pretty sure the 18-25 demograph that wish to download music outnumber the population of artists and whatnot.
Welcome to the democratically capitalistic society we call America. Heres a 1,200 calorie burger and 25g sugar soda.