View Single Post
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-08-2006, 17:42
Chris Marra's Avatar
Chris Marra Chris Marra is offline
The Blue Alliance Staff / 177 Alum
no team (TBA / Bobcat Robotics)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: South Windsor, CT
Posts: 309
Chris Marra has a reputation beyond reputeChris Marra has a reputation beyond reputeChris Marra has a reputation beyond reputeChris Marra has a reputation beyond reputeChris Marra has a reputation beyond reputeChris Marra has a reputation beyond reputeChris Marra has a reputation beyond reputeChris Marra has a reputation beyond reputeChris Marra has a reputation beyond reputeChris Marra has a reputation beyond reputeChris Marra has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mac G4 render farm

This would only be advantageous to a Maya or Cinema 4d setup where animation is involved. Each machine out of the 36 can each independently set up the entire scene, and work on a seperate frame, and then send it back to the master machine which compiles them together. So even if it takes a Mac Pro 2 seconds to do 1 frame, and one of these 20 seconds, it is still faster because in 20 seconds, you actually get 36 frames out of it, not just 10. As long as a Mac Pro is less than 18 times faster per core, these are technically faster.

However, under load a Mac Pro consumes about 200W-250W , vs about at least 50W per G4, which adds up to at least about 1800 Watts, but most likely not more than 3600W. With about 10 times the power consumption, you're paying a significant amount just to run a full farm of these, and I doubt that they would be significantly faster than Mac Pro's enough that getting a few extras wouldn't be enough to settle any potential gap.
__________________
Team 177 - Bobcat Robotics