Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Greg Marra
All of the decent text-based browsers do a wonderful job displaying standards compliant XHTML/CSS. So since all of your pages are coded standards-compliantly (right?  ), these text-based browsers will display them perfectly, albeit without any images, but then again that isn't a problem because you're Section 508 compliant too. |
My issue with standards isn't really with text-based browsers, that was sort of a side-track. If someone's using a text-based browser and it complies with XHTML/CSS2, then that's fine with me. I just don't know why anyone would.
My bigger problem is people who use out-dated software, holding back web developers who want to use fairly mainstream CSS formatting code and feel bad about the 23 and a half remaining Netscape 4 users. I also wish there were some hard-line javascript standards, but something tells me that isn't in the near future.
Does anyone know if FF2 will have CSS3 support? IE6's current version and IE7 support CSS3 and it has some interesting features. Once Firefox is on the CSS3 bandwagon, it will probably make the jump to mainstream more quickly. *hopes*