View Single Post
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-09-2006, 11:17
Tom Bottiglieri Tom Bottiglieri is offline
Registered User
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,186
Tom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Designing the Robot

Quote:
Originally Posted by Budda648
648 is a bit different. Everyone comes up with ideas and sells them to the engineers and pretty much the rest of the team. Then Ed, our head engineer, takes the ideas 10X further and works them out in CAD and Inventor and re-presents them to the team. Then we vote on them. Fairly simple, but it takes about a week and a half.
I'm not quite sure I agree with that. While it is good to involve the whole team with decisions about the robot's main strategy and basic build features, it may not be best to leave a technical decision up to a commitee of people who really have no business voting.

I'm not saying that to put your methods down. I'm saying that because I have too many times seen a poor design win one of these so called "elections" due to people on the design team talking up their particular idea to others, or one design simply looking better than another in the CAD models.
Reply With Quote