View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-10-2006, 21:52
Imajie Imajie is offline
Registered User
AKA: James Letendre
FRC #0195 (Cyber Knights)
Team Role: Electrical
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Southington
Posts: 114
Imajie has much to be proud ofImajie has much to be proud ofImajie has much to be proud ofImajie has much to be proud ofImajie has much to be proud ofImajie has much to be proud ofImajie has much to be proud ofImajie has much to be proud of
Send a message via AIM to Imajie
Re: Drive Train Comparison 2006

Quote:
Originally Posted by Holtzman
Not true. 1503 successfully climbed the ramp once in GLR with a single tread.

Broken treads aside, they were the right call for our strategy last year. They allowed us to hold our position while shooting, which was crucial due to our lack of turret. For a different strategy, a 6 wheel may have been the best, or maybe a swerve. It all depends on how you play the game. We put a good deal of thought into choosing the right drive base for the game, rather than just building the same one over and over again. We don't get the same level of refinement on our drive bases that you see on for example 25's 6 wheel, but by designing for a specific game strategy, we ensure our drive base is a good fit to our strategy. There's no need to force a square peg through a round hole.
That could have been a problem with our team last year. We decided, for some reason , what base and drive system we would use before the game was announced, but it worked out fine because it happened to work with our strategy.
I don't want to think about what would have happened if we went a different way with our strategy
__________________
2007 UTC Champions Thanks 1124 and 558
2007 UTC GM Industrial Design Award

2006 Newton Divisional Winners
2006 Championship finalists
(Thanks 25 and 968 for picking us!)
2006 National Innovation in Control