View Single Post
  #17   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-10-2006, 15:06
Lil' Lavery Lil' Lavery is offline
TSIMFD
AKA: Sean Lavery
FRC #1712 (DAWGMA)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 6,649
Lil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Lil' Lavery
Re: Drive Train Comparison 2006

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Delles
217, 1126, 25

Once again these are the stronger teams that had turreting shooters. These teams were fast when they needed to be, and all could unload relatively fast so it didn't matter if you hit them, because given a few free seconds and the match was over. These drive trains seemed to me to be more freely moving than those that needed to fend off as they shot.
217 was nearly impossible to force out of position, trust me. 116 could shove around around 95% of the robots we faced. We were able to dislocate 1261 and push them into 281, dislocating BOTH of them from shooting position in Peachtree. We even managed to hold position against 234 and 1625 pushing us at the same time (until 234 got under as and we tipped). But we couldn't make 217 budge.

And 494/70 had turrets btw.
__________________
Being correct doesn't mean you don't have to explain yourself.

Last edited by Lil' Lavery : 25-10-2006 at 16:23.