|
Re: Ideas to move in the direction of making FIRST competitions 'fair'
"Well, since Johnny is a slower runner than Alex, we'll put his finish line 10 meters closer so it's a fair race."
You'll never hear that at the Olympics.
As the coach of a small team with limited funds and limited experience, I think the way they've got FIRST set up is fantastic. If our team went in and won the whole thing as it is, it would be absolutely spectacular. However, if we were given accommodations, I think any victory would be cheapened. I would rather earn it.
As it is, we celebrate our small victories. Winning any matches were cause for ecstacy. Even though our dumper bot wasn't one of the strongest, we feel we contributed with our defensive play and strategizing. I think preparation is critical - the team members have to come in with realistic expectations. If we finish a regional or offseason with a winning record in match play, we'd probably go crazy. If we get picked as an alliance partner, I can't imagine the emotions from the kids, especially the veteran members. Sometimes the struggles make victory so much sweeter.
Also, I believe it is up to the veteran teams to show a great example, keep the bar raised high, and go out of their way to help out. In November, all the FIRST teams in Indiana will meet at Kokomo for a workshop. Teams will learn from the masters - Baker, Fultz, Florence, Beatty, etc. about all aspects of being a FIRST team, from fundraising and sponsorships to pneumatics and drivetrains.
The great equalizer in this competition is knowledge, highlighted by chiefdelphi.com itself. We can share ideas, philosophies, experiences, successes and failures.
One thing I do think would help is awards. Perhaps make some awards that would go to smaller/younger/poorer teams other than Rookie All-Star. Being publicly recognized as an up-and-comer would create a ton of inspiration for a team. Perhaps the Look-Out award? Wait-Til-Next-Year award?
gah. Now I sound like a Cubs fan.
__________________
Hi!
|