View Single Post
  #48   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-11-2006, 15:44
Lil' Lavery Lil' Lavery is offline
TSIMFD
AKA: Sean Lavery
FRC #1712 (DAWGMA)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 6,634
Lil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Lil' Lavery
Re: [Official 2007 Game Design] Radical Tournament Ideas

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billfred
I thought about this while running to my business law class (remember kids, don't forget to make sure your alarm will actually go off in the morning): What about a "knockout punch" that, if achieved, would end the match immediately in favor of the alliance that achieves it?

The nearest example I can think of is if the center goal in Aim High was cleared by a human player instead of a field crew member. (Yes, I realize this introduces other issues, like using the stick to remove balls from the goal, but play along here.) If one alliance clogged the center goal to the point that the human player could not clear the clog within ten seconds, the match would end immediately.

In Triple Play, an example might be maintaining ownership of all nine goals at one time.
Remembers variable length matches in 2001..... oh god
__________________
Being correct doesn't mean you don't have to explain yourself.