Thread: FusionEdit v0.1
View Single Post
  #25   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-11-2006, 20:19
Astronouth7303's Avatar
Astronouth7303 Astronouth7303 is offline
Why did I come back?
AKA: Jamie Bliss
FRC #4967 (That ONE Team)
Team Role: Mentor
  
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 2,071
Astronouth7303 has much to be proud ofAstronouth7303 has much to be proud ofAstronouth7303 has much to be proud ofAstronouth7303 has much to be proud ofAstronouth7303 has much to be proud ofAstronouth7303 has much to be proud ofAstronouth7303 has much to be proud ofAstronouth7303 has much to be proud ofAstronouth7303 has much to be proud ofAstronouth7303 has much to be proud of
Re: FusionEdit v0.1
Quote:
Originally Posted by EHaskins
But, really I think the ide a behind this and other projects similar us that the technology er're using for FIRST has been stolen from other purposes. We should have an all in one soultion for programming, downloading, SVN, and any other things I can't think of right now.
How about a distribution of Eclipse that includes the CDT, the MCC18 toolchain, the PIC C highlighting/indexing extensions, Subclipse, pyctools, and other stuff I can't think of right now? (Plus downloads for python, mcc18 wine wrappers, and win32 make.)

I'm going to be up-front with this: You can't top Eclipse. Between the code completion, going-to-definitions-of-functions, automatic compilation, managed make & multiple targets, plug-in architecture, projects, versioning, and broad user base (not to mention IBM), beating it is somewhere between hard and a miracle.

Any home-brewed IDE I'm going to be skeptical of. (Take that as a challenge.)

BTW, how much would it cost to produce 1200 CDs?