Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Billfred
EDIT: And another idea in a completely different vein, inspired by Rick TYler's post on page 1:
So imagine if we took this a step further. The Top 8 would be prohibited from picking each other, which I'm normally in favor of allowing, but that would be too painful here. Each alliance captain would have X number of points with which to purchase their alliance partners. Note that I didn't specify how many--alliances in eliminations would not be limited in size, at least in theory. You could just bid on two great partners and hope nobody breaks, or maybe have four or five mid-card robots that you could switch between to suit your strategy.
|
This sounds fun. Kinda like a GM building a sports team by signing free agents, while restricted by a salary cap.
But I do think the higher seeded alliance captains should get a bigger budget. Say the number one alliance captain gets 135 bananas to bid with, number two gets 130 bananas, and so on, with number eight getting 100 bananas. Once you've spent your bananas, they are gone -- use 'em or lose 'em.
__________________
Richard Wallace
Mentor since 2011 for FRC 3620 Average Joes (St. Joseph, Michigan)
Mentor 2002-10 for FRC 931 Perpetual Chaos (St. Louis, Missouri)
since 2003
I believe in intuition and inspiration. Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited, whereas imagination embraces the entire world, stimulating progress, giving birth to evolution. It is, strictly speaking, a real factor in scientific research.
(Cosmic Religion : With Other Opinions and Aphorisms (1931) by Albert Einstein, p. 97)