Thread: Ethics 101: To re-use or not to re-use?
View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-12-2006, 18:54
MikeDubreuil's Avatar
MikeDubreuil MikeDubreuil is offline
Carpe diem
FRC #0125 (Nu-Trons)
Team Role: Engineer
  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 967
MikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to MikeDubreuil
Re: Ethics 101: To re-use or not to re-use?
Let me start off by making a bad analogy to hardware. In the past 5 years the hardware guys have made a significant improvement in the FIRST program by encouraging the spread of designs. From multiple speed transmissions to omni-wheels to some craziness called swerve drive- they are sharing everything! Yet, on the software side we want to keep our code hidden. Teams put their electronics in black boxes. It's getting bad. Maybe we should take a play out of the hardware guys book?

Here's my 10 cents...
Teams have a 1 season monopoly on their software. If a veteran team wants to re-use code from a previous year they should be required to post it in a "Software Portfolio" hosted by FIRST. The portfolio is publicly available to everyone. A new regional award can be created for veteran teams who share code, "The Software Award." An award that celebrates a teams generosity and their ability to write good software with even better documentation.
__________________
"FIRST is like bling bling for the brain." - Woodie Flowers
Reply With Quote