View Single Post
  #25   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-12-2006, 19:30
Tom Bottiglieri Tom Bottiglieri is offline
Registered User
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,189
Tom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Microsoft Robotics Studio

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris31 View Post
Yeah, Im not sure completly who they are targetting. Not like your gonna run windows on you PIC16 or PIC18 chips.
Thats not the point. Embedded devices are much harder to code for than applications on a PC. The whole point of this is you can develop intricate programs on the PC that have access to all the processing power and memory available to them. You can write code that accesses SQL databases, gets data off the internet, or runs algorithms that are way too complex and intensive to run on the PIC... You get the point? They've included a Visual programming language (looks a bit like the easyC we've come to know, except WAY more powerful), or you can code in any visual studio editor. (C++, C#, VB.. etc..)

This also gives you a full suite of simulation capabilities. I dont know one FIRST team out there who has had enough time to fully program their robot in the build season. Theoretically, this simulation system will stop that problem.

I'll be working on getting this to interact with FIRST hardware. Even if its only good for prototyping and tuning individual system, it beats having to hard code everything.