
14-12-2006, 12:45
|
 |
 |
updates this status less than FB!
AKA: the one who "will break into your thoughts..."
 FRC #0237 (Black Magic)
Team Role: Mentor
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: H20-Town, Connecticut
Posts: 7,773
|
|
|
Re: Big CIM Impressions
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben Piecuch
Well, I STFA and didn't find exactly what I was looking for. My question goes out to teams that previously used the small CIM's on their drive, and switched to the big CIM's in 2006.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben Piecuch
Specifically, did you notice any perceivable lack of power/torque? Did the motor exhibit any difference in electrical performance (current draw?) Looking at the specs, the Big CIM looses about 20% of power to the small CIM. But, when used in the kit gearbox with a small CIM, the gearbox should only loose about 10% of a dual small CIM setup.
Not knowing what the game will call for this year, I'm just hoping to see how flexible our motor usage can be. Any general, or specific, comments on the big CIM will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
BEN
|
Ben, as I'm sure you are familiar with our bot's setup I'll leave out some details but attach this pic.
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/25671
Anyways, we used 2 of the big Cim's on the shooter wheel mechanism for the sole purpose to get the wheel to have less time before it was back up to speed.
It worked out great, and we blew one motor at Battlecry, and you could definitely tell the difference when we went up one match with only one.
The time in between going from post-shoot speed to gaining full momentum in the shooter wheel was dramatically reduced with both motors.
As far as drive, we used the regular Cim's this year so I'm not sure how the new larger mini-bike motor Cim's would have worked.
__________________
The influence of many leads to the individuality of one. - E.C.C. (That's me!!)
|