Quote:
Originally Posted by dlavery
Making a complete condemnation of the technology based on a single experience with just one point in the solution space is erroneous. An implied statement like "I don't like the CVT on our SUV, therefore all CVTs are bad" indicates imprecision and assumption in the analysis. Whereas "I have seen some issues with CVT on automobiles that MAY also occur with robot CVT transmissions - we should look into this some more" is a more appropriate response when the available information is incomplete and imprecise.
-dave
|
When did I say I didnt like the CVT on our SUV? Good job putting words in my mouth. In fact, I think quite the opposite. It is incredibly enjoyable to drive around town, and if accelerates only seconds slower than a Honda S2000.
HOWEVER, I wouldnt use any sort of CVT on something that tows or pushes such as a front end loader, simply because the pushing power would be delayed, as well as it would be incredible stress on either the balls or belts.
The same is true to robots. Sudden collisions or load on the drivetrain would reak havok on a CVT tranny.
Ever repaired one? I have, and it wasnt a pleasant experience.