View Single Post
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-12-2006, 08:43
65_Xero_Huskie's Avatar
65_Xero_Huskie 65_Xero_Huskie is offline
One T
AKA: Mat
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 697
65_Xero_Huskie has a reputation beyond repute65_Xero_Huskie has a reputation beyond repute65_Xero_Huskie has a reputation beyond repute65_Xero_Huskie has a reputation beyond repute65_Xero_Huskie has a reputation beyond repute65_Xero_Huskie has a reputation beyond repute65_Xero_Huskie has a reputation beyond repute65_Xero_Huskie has a reputation beyond repute65_Xero_Huskie has a reputation beyond repute65_Xero_Huskie has a reputation beyond repute65_Xero_Huskie has a reputation beyond repute
Re: A thought about scoring

Quote:
Originally Posted by GaryV1188 View Post
For some games it could work - given the timing constraints noted by the OP. For instance in Triple Play, either a tetra was stacked or it wasn't - once the refs made the determination, all they had to do was count.


I bet the refs were worried about that and im glad we had some good refs then, or our match woulda been messed up from that game. If the refs are not qualified for refing jobs then they should not be involved, but i think FIRST would not put in underqualified people for important jobs.
__________________
Min-Max to the Max!