View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-12-2006, 21:51
JBotAlan's Avatar
JBotAlan JBotAlan is offline
Forever chasing the 'bot around
AKA: Jacob Rau
FRC #5263
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Riverview, MI
Posts: 723
JBotAlan has a reputation beyond reputeJBotAlan has a reputation beyond reputeJBotAlan has a reputation beyond reputeJBotAlan has a reputation beyond reputeJBotAlan has a reputation beyond reputeJBotAlan has a reputation beyond reputeJBotAlan has a reputation beyond reputeJBotAlan has a reputation beyond reputeJBotAlan has a reputation beyond reputeJBotAlan has a reputation beyond reputeJBotAlan has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to JBotAlan Send a message via Yahoo to JBotAlan
Re: 2007 KOP RoHS requirements

Maybe I'm just missing something, but from what I just read, the RoHS directive is just that--a directive, not a law. So, I don't see why the KOP manufacturers would change based on a directive.

Now, I could be wrong, but that's what the Wiki article says:

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ROHS

Quote:
Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive (RoHS) 2002/95/EC [1] was adopted in February 2003 by the European Union. The RoHS directive took effect on July 1, 2006, but is not a law; it is simply a directive.
It does seem that these requirements would not be fun to comply with, but I don't see anywhere that the kit of parts must comply.

JBot
__________________
Aren't signatures a bit outdated?