View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-01-2007, 01:11
newton418's Avatar
newton418 newton418 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Ryan Newton
FRC #0418 (Purple Haze)
Team Role: Driver
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 58
newton418 is a name known to allnewton418 is a name known to allnewton418 is a name known to allnewton418 is a name known to allnewton418 is a name known to allnewton418 is a name known to all
Re: pic: DeWalt Gearbox with two CIMs

Quote:
Originally Posted by newton418 View Post
To specify my question, why not get the extra torque after running each CIM through their own DeWalt transmissions? Though I have to say, if it only weights 2.5 lbs without the motors, that would be a good reason. If you build it make sure to post pictures and results!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Needel View Post
Running each cim into it's own transmission would not give you extra torque. In most if not all cases the total torque is the same. Since each motor has a maximum amount of power it can generate at 12 volts within the given amperage requirements all you would be doing by making separate gearboxes is spreading out the load. In this situation the only reason I would consider doing that is if I was concerned with the torque of 2 cims breaking the deWalt transmission (yes I am thinking that).

From my experience in drive train design I will always advise that people go with a central gearbox and power transmitted through chain or another means. This is due to your overall friction force (another discussion) but basically if you spread out the load to all of your wheels each wheel can take the total torque produced in the situation where another set is off the ground (assuming the mass is over the wheels touching the ground) that is where the normal force/ weight of the robot plays in (yet another discussion) either way keeping your motors together will save you weight in the long run and give you the nice ability to put the torque everywhere you want it to be in the correct situations.
What I meant by "the extra torque" is the extra torque you are getting from the second motor. Basically, you have two different scenarios:

(1) You have a transmission with a given ratio, and you have two identical motors inputting power (as in your design), then you get a specific max output torque from the transmission. This can then be connected to a drive train (preferably where all wheels are connected, so you power all wheels), determining the max output torque on the wheel axels.

(2) Now consider taking the same motors and the same transmission, and having one motor input power into one transmission. If you take two of these single motor-transmission assemblies and connect the output shaft of each transmission to a drive train (where all wheels are connected), you end up with the same max output torque on the wheel axels.

So my question is, what is the advantage to the former setup (besides potentially saving weight)?
__________________
Team 418 Purple Haze
http://www.lasarobotics.org/
Reply With Quote