Thread: G23 vs. G48
View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-01-2007, 15:45
FourPenguins's Avatar
FourPenguins FourPenguins is offline
Back in the Game
AKA: Ed Venator
FRC #2399
Team Role: Mentor
  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Mount Olive, NJ
Posts: 261
FourPenguins has much to be proud ofFourPenguins has much to be proud ofFourPenguins has much to be proud ofFourPenguins has much to be proud ofFourPenguins has much to be proud ofFourPenguins has much to be proud ofFourPenguins has much to be proud ofFourPenguins has much to be proud ofFourPenguins has much to be proud ofFourPenguins has much to be proud of
Re: G23 vs. G48
Quote:
Originally Posted by P.J. Baker View Post
G23 appears to address only the chute, saying that the chute is a one-way device (HP to robot) and can not be used to pass from robot to HP. G48 is a global rule which covers all of the ways the tubes may enter.
I agree. However, as worded, there is no proof that g48 supercedes the other interpretation of g23. I'd like to hear from someone in FIRST on this rule, just to confirm this.
__________________
MORT 11
-2005 New Jersey Regional Chairman's Award Winner
-2006 Palmetto Regional Winner
-2007 New York Regional Delphi Driving Tomorrow's Technology Award
-2008 New Jersey Regional Finalist, Chesapeake Regional Winner, Championship Event Overall Top Seed
HB 2399
-2009 Buckeye Regional Delphi Driving Tomorrow's Technology Award, Pittsburgh Regional GM Industrial Design Award