View Single Post
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2007, 00:11
Tetraman's Avatar
Tetraman Tetraman is offline
FIRST on my mind
AKA: Evan Raitt
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 1,322
Tetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond repute
Re: More Strategy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian S. View Post
I think the teams with simple ringer designs will compete better, while the complex ramp/crane/lifter bots for the bonus end game points will fall behind.
I'm going to strongly disagree with the second part of your statement. My reason is that one robot lifted a foot gives the alliance the same amount of points a row of 5 does, or 3-4 rows of three rigs give you. It is much easier to get 30 points by lifting a robot rather than placing rings. 30 points is a big deal. It can bring you from 20 to 50, and in this game thats huge. Than just think about 60 for two robots up.

I can easily see all regional winning teams to have two robots that worked well in rings and a defense bot that lifted robots.
__________________
"For every great theory about design, there is a better and contradictory theory about design. And don't let the irony of that escape you."