View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2007, 19:20
Lil' Lavery Lil' Lavery is offline
TSIMFD
AKA: Sean Lavery
FRC #1712 (DAWGMA)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 6,600
Lil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Lil' Lavery
Re: Dual CIMs gear box adapter

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ianworld View Post
Dr. Joe I recently heard that planetary gearboxes were much more efficient than that(on the order of 98%) but I'd hate to argue with you and what I heard could very well have just been hearsay. Do you have a good website or other source you could direct me to that explains the efficiencies of planetary gearboxes?
Think about it logically. A spur gear is typically about 95% efficient. A planetary gearbox contains multiple spur gears, therefore, it should be less efficient than a spur gear.
__________________
Being correct doesn't mean you don't have to explain yourself.