Thread: Poor GP?
View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-01-2007, 10:59
BGiraud's Avatar
BGiraud BGiraud is offline
Registered User
AKA: G
FRC #1676 (Pascack Pi-oneers)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Montvale, NJ
Posts: 40
BGiraud is a splendid one to beholdBGiraud is a splendid one to beholdBGiraud is a splendid one to beholdBGiraud is a splendid one to beholdBGiraud is a splendid one to beholdBGiraud is a splendid one to beholdBGiraud is a splendid one to beholdBGiraud is a splendid one to behold
Poor GP?

I think the answer to this question is obvious, but I need to ask it anyway.

Teams are allowed to play defense within the rules. Many teams design specifically for that. A good designed robot can shut down a #1 robot to zero points. This effectively makes the defensive robot very valuable to a championship caliber alliance.

What if the defensive design was for the robot to park itself in front of the opposing alliance drivers station and some how entirely block the view of the human drivers of a specific (#1) team? This would effectively shut down that teams ability to score.

Is this poor GP or amazing strategy? Would it be praised, or shunned? Would you get picked or black listed?

I have been on the bad end of this before. A student in a state wide competition was getting booed by crowd for a successful "back door" design. It was like the British saying that the Colonial use of sniper tactics was unethical.

Please advise.
Reply With Quote