View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-01-2007, 14:05
Daniel_LaFleur's Avatar
Daniel_LaFleur Daniel_LaFleur is offline
Mad Scientist
AKA: Me
FRC #2040 (DERT)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 1,959
Daniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to Daniel_LaFleur
Re: Risk of the Lift?

Quote:
Originally Posted by firstbots195 View Post
It is almost going to be impossible to use a lift to elevate your alliance's robots. It is going to be impossible because pneumanic cylinders are not going to give enough force to exert a lifting device.
The 2" Bimba cylindar has a push factor of just over 3. So 60PSI in the cylindar will provide just over 180 pounds of pushing force . In other words, a single 2" cylindar has the pushing force to lift a robot.

Believe me, there will be a LOT of successful lifts.

As far as which is safer ... both are just as safe. The same amount of energy will be in either design because you are raising the robot the same height. Damage occurs only when that energy is expended (IE a robot hits the floor). The difference is who's in control of the robot at the time of an accident .