|
Re: Banebot Transmission Issues
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben Piecuch
Whoa, let me get a grip on what you're saying here Joe.
You're saying that the FIRST Supplied Kit gearbox, the 56mm, small CIM, primary drive 12:1 ratio gearbox is barely adequate (about 2x factor of safety) for a single CIM install under cyclic loading. Yet, FIRST and Banebots offer a 2x CIM adapter for use in these exact transmissions? Doesn't this 2x CIM adapter effectively reduce my factor of safety on that double-D to 1x?
(I won't even get into the gear change option that brings this gearbox to a 16:1 ratio...)
Is this a good thing? Am I supposed to feel confident in the fact that FIRST and Banebots have given us a product to hang ourselves with? And, to discover this at week 3 into our build? I'm a little disturbed here!
I can understand doing my own Due Diligence on a COTS part that I purchased for my robot. But I should't expect to have to do the same to a FIRST supplied and mechanically approved part(s.) Correctly me if I'm wrong here, Joe. (Please...)
BEN
|
Ben and Joe,
You're both making me nervous. We are in the same boat. Having trusted FIRST to do some of the "due diligence" for us, we are using the 2 into 1 adaptor as well.
I do not have any experience with the set up yet as we have not powered up the drive train yet. Although, Ben, check the run out of the 2 spur gears that mesh the CIMs into the BB 'top hat'. One of the sets out of three we bought is out by a lot, probably 5-10 degrees. Too much for my taste, BB has an email to answer.
__________________
Co-Founder/Mentor FRC Team 839 / JrFLL Team 137/Rosie Robotics/Agawam HS
Winner NEF District WPI 2016
Regional CA-08 Boston, 12 WPI, Eng'g Excellence, 12-15 UL Safety, 15 Motorola Quality
KPCB Entrepreneurship 04, 05, 06, 07, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16
Rookie All Star and Top Rookie Seed 2002
Paul Harris Fellow, CMP Inspector 05-16, Head LRI NE FIRST JTB 1944-2008 "What did you do with your dash?"
|