View Single Post
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-01-2007, 18:42
RaMoore's Avatar
RaMoore RaMoore is offline
Registered User
AKA: Rachel Moore
FRC #3005 (RoboChargers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 65
RaMoore has much to be proud ofRaMoore has much to be proud ofRaMoore has much to be proud ofRaMoore has much to be proud ofRaMoore has much to be proud ofRaMoore has much to be proud ofRaMoore has much to be proud ofRaMoore has much to be proud ofRaMoore has much to be proud ofRaMoore has much to be proud of
Re: Banebot 56mm gearbox - double D related

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Johnson View Post
Some questions:
Why do it 3 times?

Did you "temper" the part after the final time you quenched it?

Will you do your test again only with the non-hardened carrier for a baseline?

Thanks for the data.

Joe J.
We did it three times to guarantee that we got hardening all the way to the core of the material. To harden the material further we would have to use higher temperatures and cool it faster and we felt this was unnecessary. Before hardening we were able to easily shave pieces of steel off the edges (using a pocket knife) and after the third quenching we could no longer shave large pieces of material off.

We didn’t temper the material following the third quenching because hardening the material to the point we would need to temper it is beyond our capabilities.

We will repeat the test with one of our unhardened carriers and post results soon.
__________________
Rachel Moore
REV Robotics | www.revrobotics.com