View Single Post
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-02-2007, 10:09
MrForbes's Avatar
MrForbes MrForbes is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jim
FRC #1726 (N.E.R.D.S.)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Sierra Vista AZ
Posts: 6,022
MrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Our Bane bots Experience

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gdeaver View Post
The tools I beat the c##p out of and they survive year after year do not have planetary gears. There are some things to like about parallel shaft spur gear transmissions.
OTOH, the automotive transmissions that I put a lot of power thru and they survive year after year have planetary gears, not parallel shaft spur gears. Being planetary or conventional doesn't really matter as much as using a transmission within it's design limits.

The BB transmissions that we are using for arms have a LOT of gear reduction, and really do need to be stronger for the use we're giving them. If you want to use a low cost transmission, then you have to realize that you are using a low cost transmission, and design the robot to be easy on it. BB doesn't have a torque limit or shock load limit warning on these things...maybe they should.