View Single Post
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-02-2007, 21:39
whytheheckme's Avatar
whytheheckme whytheheckme is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jacob Komar
no team
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 1,320
whytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via ICQ to whytheheckme Send a message via AIM to whytheheckme Send a message via MSN to whytheheckme Send a message via Yahoo to whytheheckme
Re: Problems with Encoder Counting

We use these encoders.

Initially, we used the direction portion of it with the Encoder card. The problem with this is that the encoder needs to calibrated VERY WELL. 2 of our wheels we couldnt get the signals at 90 degrees or even 80 degrees because there was not enough play on the mount. We decided just to wire one of the encoders on each wheel directly to the computer and not use the encoder cards. Our program figures out the direction.
Ironically, this procedure wound up frying our encoders (not through fault of the encoders themselves)... A 12V signal was *accidentally* applied to the 5V Digital I/O bus by a *non-electrical* member of the team. This fried the encoders. What's ironic about this, is that had we been using the encoder cards, this would not have broken the encoders.

Anyway, thats my opinion.
Jacob

--Remember, good rep is always nice for a useful post!