[Adam Y.]

Originally Posted by The Lucas

Do you consider macros more or less readable than what you have?

A macro for that statement off the top of my heads is

#define writeShadow(S,R)   while((S).CANMC.bit.CCR==0){(S).CANMC.all=(R).CANMC.all;};

Then you just say:

writeShadow(ECanaShadow,ECanaRegs)

I haven't tested that, but it should be close. I assume those are the structs that are going to change from statement to statement. Anyway it is a start if you like it.

Yes. This is exactly what Im thinking off. Thank you. It's exponentially much easier to read that than having two structures whose only difference is the name.

I haven't tested that, but it should be close. I assume those are the structs that are going to change from statement to statement. Anyway it is a start if you like it.

The two structures are going to be the same but both structures have multiple registers defined. So my macro is going to have the register defined and then the specific bit of the register.

#define writeShadow(S,R)   ECanaShadow.(S).bit.(R)

Unfortunately, its not working because the compiler is giving me an error that it's expecting a field name.