Thread: Peer Judging
View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-02-2007, 13:02
pmax's Avatar
pmax pmax is offline
Registered User
AKA: Peter Maxfield
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 67
pmax is a name known to allpmax is a name known to allpmax is a name known to allpmax is a name known to allpmax is a name known to allpmax is a name known to all
Re: Peer Judging

I can assure you that technological excellence has been the primary aspect the judges have looked at in past years. We have asked for other items (process photos, website, etc) to both provide some context for the submissions, and also to help differentiate the top 10% of the teams.

If you are using good engineering practices, documenting them, facilitiating the tools you have, and can present this well, you are doing everything you can to compete for the award.

Our goal for the peer judging aspect was to generate excitement and have everyone feel they were a part of the decision.

Of course, any feedback in the process is appreciated. This award is for your hard work!

Regards,
Pete
__________________
www.autodesk.com/first