View Single Post
  #17   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-03-2007, 23:12
Hieb Hieb is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 125
Hieb is a splendid one to beholdHieb is a splendid one to beholdHieb is a splendid one to beholdHieb is a splendid one to beholdHieb is a splendid one to beholdHieb is a splendid one to beholdHieb is a splendid one to behold
Re: Our Banebots Experience

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel_LaFleur View Post
So, just to back up what Dr. Joe has been saying all along, These transmissions are not bad. They are inexpensive and we (as robotics teams) tend to push these things beyond their tolerances.
Perhaps someone can help me out here then (now that it's after the fact for us). I thought I had done the calculations correctly, but apparently not.

I had a 3.5 foot arm, total weight about 6 pounds. Using the 540 motor into the 64:1 gearbox, we then stepped down 28:10 and 70:10. The few times before shipping that we were able to test the arm it worked fine except for the backdrive. Then on ship day we fried the motor while driving it to the crate.

On Thursday we replaced the motor and swapped the 64:1 with a 125:1 gearbox. We proceded to fry 2 more motors before scrapping motors and switching to pneumatics (which were also abandoned for lack of time and a better strategy).

Also of note--we had a 20 amp breaker on the motor (stall current 42 amps) and in one practice match we completely drained a battery and the motor smoked with only 2 seconds left in the match.

Have I just messed up my calcs and completly abused these poor motors, or is there another issue here?