View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-03-2007, 21:56
d.courtney's Avatar
d.courtney d.courtney is offline
Registered User
AKA: David
FRC #0781 (Kinetic Knights)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Kincardine, Ontario
Posts: 196
d.courtney has much to be proud ofd.courtney has much to be proud ofd.courtney has much to be proud ofd.courtney has much to be proud ofd.courtney has much to be proud ofd.courtney has much to be proud ofd.courtney has much to be proud ofd.courtney has much to be proud ofd.courtney has much to be proud ofd.courtney has much to be proud of
Re: Squishing the Spiders

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Blair View Post
The important thing is efficiency and ease of use. You could argue, depending on the setup, that a one inch lip is significantly harder to negotiate than a shallow ramp. And if your lift fails, mechanically or time wise, it fails. No points. If a ramp is well constructed, its the skill of the driver decides the points earned.

But, I will agree with you that the webcasts suggested lifts often proved more effective than ramps- generally because of the lack of side guards. Week two and on may be a different story.
Well it works both ways, I have seen teams with ramps that got caught as they lowered them rendering them useless. What I was referring to was between a well designed ramp and well designed lift (locks into place as to not fail after the match), then the lift will always be better, if only because a team with very little ground clearance can get on. Yes some like to drive up a gradual ramp rather then a 1 inch lip, which was the very reason we added a 8 inch gradual slop on our end of our platform. Time wise I would argue they are the same, the time it takes for a team to drive up a ramp successfully without falling of is about that of lifting two robots.

But as you said, only time will tell which are better and more reliable.