Thread: Smaller robots
View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-08-2001, 18:48
patrickrd's Avatar
patrickrd patrickrd is offline
Registered User
AKA: Patrick Dingle
no team
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Medford, MA
Posts: 349
patrickrd is a splendid one to beholdpatrickrd is a splendid one to beholdpatrickrd is a splendid one to beholdpatrickrd is a splendid one to beholdpatrickrd is a splendid one to beholdpatrickrd is a splendid one to beholdpatrickrd is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to patrickrd
Thumbs up Smaller robots

Over the years, the FIRST robot sizes have been getting bigger and bigger. These larger sizes, although they do allow teams more freedom in designing their robot, have many negative aspects as well. Personally, I think FIRST would gain a lot if they decreased the robot sizes a bit... To somewhere about 50-75% of the current volume. I just think smaller machines are more impressive, it forces teams to be more clever and efficient in their designs, and we could cut the playing field size in half (that means teams could compete twice as much at regionals and nationals).

What do others think about robot sizes?

- Patrick, having some crazy vision of tiny robots zipping around picking up and throwing Nerf footballs.
Reply With Quote