Quote:
Originally Posted by FunkyRatDemon
I like how we were left off this list... 
You guys did great at PNW |
You guys did some great defense. You were definately high on our list of teams to pick, as we knew how heavy the defensive game was going to get in the finals. (and we were positive that drivetrain would have zero problems with our lifts
)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisXPPro
i have to say, these stats dont seem every correct, we had mininum of 2 rings each round, when not being tackeled by other teams, we had a max of 7 1 round, but we usely got 4 up! so i have to say that these arent every correct
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericand
Which average are you using (mean, median, mode) for ringers/match?
1425 had 2 matches where the gripper didn't work so for those it scored 0, Thus the average ranking failed to predict performance in the championship (were we had things working).
I would think looking at the numbers using a median number of ringers scored might be interesting.
|
I prefaced this by saying that the data was from friday only. I know teams did better on saturday, but so did most people.
Our data showed for 1425:
Match Ringers
3 2
12 3
20 0
29 3
37 0
46 4
Which, averages (mean) to 2 ringers per match. Sure, the data is not perfect (just friday), and maybe it was less of an accurate indicator for 1425 then other teams (you guys did outperform the alliance max score predictions versus 360, 2046, and 2149).