Thread: "Random" match Schedules
View Single Post
  #193   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-03-2007, 07:14
Jack Jones Jack Jones is offline
Retired
no team
  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Waterford, MI
Posts: 964
Jack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond repute
Re: "Random" match Schedules
Quote:
Originally Posted by T. Hoffman View Post
I'm thinking teams like 968, 1038, 1126, 1114, etc. are loving the fact FIRST considers them to be "mid" (or even high, depending on the event) level teams.....

The likelihood of them and any other quad digit team partnering with a solid low numbered veteran team is a lot greater than the likelihood of a 2 or 3 digit team being paired with a solid quad digit team.

So how is this algorithm benefitting all teams again?
We loved it all the way into third seed at GLR.
Don't know about ALL teams, but sixth seed sure got a bonus from that.