View Single Post
  #51   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-03-2007, 15:25
AdamHeard's Avatar
AdamHeard AdamHeard is offline
Lead Mentor
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Atascadero
Posts: 5,500
AdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to AdamHeard
Re: Banebots 42mm gearbox: Recommendations for use

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lil' Lavery View Post
Are you stealing the CIM motor for the AM solution from your drive? And are you worried that the reduction of drive power will lower your ability to drive (keep in mind, lower torque not only means less pushing power, but less ability to turn and accelerate as well)? If you are replacing the CIM in your drive with a Large CIM and/or FP, it might be alright, but otherwise I'd suggest looking for an alternative arm solution that does not sacrifice your existing abilities.
Some alternatives for the 42mm Banebots include:
KoP FP gearbox (it may be a bit big and clunky, but it works better than anyone gives it credit for, I believe it is a 128:1 reduction)
AM Planetary then reduced further by an AM single speed (46.793:1 reduction, can accept two motors)
DeWalt XRP transmission (3-speed; 47:1, 15:1, or 12:1 reductions)
Our Drive will be just fine.

We are swapping out one small CIM and adding in a large CIM and a FP in the AM planetary. We just slightly above traction limited now.