View Single Post
  #36   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-04-2007, 10:08
whytheheckme's Avatar
whytheheckme whytheheckme is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jacob Komar
no team
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 1,320
whytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via ICQ to whytheheckme Send a message via AIM to whytheheckme Send a message via MSN to whytheheckme Send a message via Yahoo to whytheheckme
Re: pic: We left the boys at home

Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesBrown View Post
If your team has no need to do this then don't but please don't tell these guys that exposing parts of the team to engineering because those members hadn't had enough opportunity is against the spirit of FIRST because quite frankly it is not.
I'm not suggesting exposing parts of their team to engineering is against the spirit of FIRST. I'm simply suggesting that excluding part of their team based on their gender is not in the spirit of FIRST. I think that it's great that these girls on this team had an opportunity to experience things that they hadn't before, but this could have been accomplished (im my opinion) without excluding the boys.

Imagine if this post was the other way around, and the title read "We left the girls at home." I think that this would raise greater controversy, even though in reality, you are creating the same situation.

Jacob
Reply With Quote