Quote:
Let's see who's got a tough divison
Curie - 118 , 126, 365
Galileo - 25, 703
Newton - 111, 987
Archimedes - 254
|
Well, it doesn't mean they are any better or worse in a given year, it just means that they are astonishingly consistent. Said another way, you could say "in no year since 2005 has 365 averaged less than a top 10% finish at their regionals"
Ok, here is the awards results, attempt two. This one make substantially more sense than my last attempt, which was screwed up by excel not moving all the award labels when re-sorting, and me having left some leftover data on the sheet when I re-ran the algorithm.
The y axis is team performance, lower is better.