Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Baird
You're right, I think it was a match between 716 & 25 on one side and 236 on the other. I could be wrong. It's happened before.
|
As much as I would've liked to see an alliance score multiple keepers, it didn't happen in any of our matches at UTC. Here's a quick breakdown of our autonomous modes:
QF 1: We attempt to score, but the keeper fell before we reached the rack.
QF 16: Both 237 and 25 attempt to score their keepers and miss.
QF 22:
25, 716, 1124 all miss.
QF 27: We're the only ones to attempt to score the keeper, miss, and get caught up in the rack.
QF 34: Both us and 1124 just nearly miss scoring the keepers.
QF 46: We
slam into the rack and somehow score.
QF 49: We don't run auto (didn't have time between matches to fix the error), 1089 misses their keeper.
QF 64:
1124 and
us both score.
QF 73: Both team 230 and us miss.
QF 1-1: We're the only ones with a keeper and miss.
QF 1-2: Keeper nearly
falls onto the bottom row.
SF 1-1: We scored, 236 had a failed attempt
SF 1-2: 236 scored, we missed.
F-1: Both us and 1124 miss.
To answer the thread's original question though, I believe that at Championships, there will be multiple occasions where two keepers are scored, with it occurring within the same alliance being a bit less likely. I predict that the most that will be seen will be four keepers, two from each alliance.
Within Galileo, our division, robots with working autonomous modes (or at least ones that attempt to score) that I know of include us, 79, 116, 229, 237, 326, 341, 540, 1126, 1208, 1425, 1680, 1730, 1902, and 2056, so the potential to score multiple keepers is definitely there.