|
Re: Curie Semifinal 1 - 3, what happened?
Quote:
Originally Posted by jgannon
Several people have already said this, but I really don't think we're going to get anywhere worthwhile with the discussion of whether this play was too aggressive. However:
This seems to me to be a huge mistake. This Q&A response indicates that 1114's arm was a field element by the end of the match, so if the tube was HANGING (which it looks to be doing), then it ought to have counted. Was the ruling really that the tube was still in 1114's possession? |
yes the ruling was that the tube was apart of 1114s robot therefore not scored.
__________________
my FIRST acomplishments: 2003:GLR Chairmans winner, MWR Finalist, Archimedes Division winner, National Champion (w/ 111 and 469) 2004:MWR Finalist 2005:GLR Chairmans winner, MWR Finalist, MWR Innovation in Controls award 2006:hmmm wow, umm we got picked 4th overall at Nats by 121
my FIRST resume: 65 (2003-2006)
|